From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 24622
Date: 2003-07-17
> >1. You understood my point about the meaning carried by a pair of
> > > Also the Austronesian
> > *kurung/*kuDung "enclosure"
> > Wrong meaning, wrong pair of consonants, wrong list.
> Explain?
> But I admit to being uneasy over the analysis of **k-r-ng as prefixBlust would say Austronesian 'roots' are mostly false. :)
> *k- and root *r-ng-. That would annihilate the supposed **k-r- root.
> But then, if the word was re-loaned several times over, as posting
> #454 suggests, a new root may have been falsely extracted?