that wa sa time where Miguel posted some interesting things regarding
the PIE morphologie.
Thansk to Richard which seems to know very well how to search trough the
archive, I re-read some of the posting at that time. Glen have had some
obiection where I quote from his post:
(
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/17003 )
>>PIE *méne dissimilated from *méme (except in Sanskrit).
>There was no disimilation, which is not even possible for
>your **tuma anyway! The *-n- is found in Tyrrhenian (Etruscan /mi/
>versus /mini/) and even in Uralic (Finnish /minä/ and /minun/).
>It was used in singular pronominal paradigms for cases other than
>the nominative. (Mid IE nom *meu, acc *ménem, gen *menése)
Question:
Glen, somewhere on your pages on the net, do you have a structured
presentation of PIE personal pronouns as per your view, with its
declination?
Alex