From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 24446
Date: 2003-07-12
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:09:29 +0100, Richard WordinghamLatin *horbus
> <richard@...> wrote:
>
> >How secure is the derivation? I would expect something like
> >or *horbis / *horbs, cf. hortus 'garden', which may well berelated to
> >*g^hordh- through a different suffix/extension. Pokorny soundssceptical
> >from the way he cites the word, 'über lat. urbs `Stadt',angeblich aus
> >*ghordhos, s. Georgiev IF. 56, 200'.examples of
>
> The loss of h- is in itself not problematic: there are more
> early loss of h-. As to the vocalism, that's another issue. Iremembered
> that o > u sometimes happens in Latin, but having checked, this is(unguis),
> apparently only the case (with exceptions) before nc (uncus), ng
> mb (umbo), mc (hunc) and lC (multa, culpa). Remains thedevelopment o: >
> u: before /r/ (fu:r), which would require a vrddhi formation*gho:rdhos >
> *(h)urbs.************
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...