Re: [tied] az+

> What's the argument against Balto-Slavo-Indo-Iranian
> *h1eg^H(om), thus avoiding Winter's law, with Slavic
> exceptionally retaining the archaic form *h1eg[^](om)?
>

How can one speak of Balto-_Slavo_-Indo-Iranian *h1eg^H(om) if there are
no traces of it Slavic? ;)

But yes, it's an obvious way to explain away that inconsistency, the
only problem being the qualifier _exceptionally_.

Sergei