[tied] Re: cutulare

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:

>> BS aside, you have still to explain Sardinian and South Italian
>> forms with "s-", like in Romanian.
>
> "Ausones" was one of my assumptions. You forgot it.

I didn't forget. It just doesn't explain anything.

>>>>> I don't guess one will can begin anything with a root in
>>>>> latin as "quat-", maybe an "quatt-" n asymilation of "quatr-".
>>>>
>>>> That's pure nonsense.
>>>
>>> see "quatto"=quadrassis
>>
>> Repeated nonsense remains nonsense.
>
> Or one is simply ignorant about a question. In this case it seems
> you are the one. "quatto" is from "quadrassis", verify your
> dictionary.

Repeatedly repeated nonsense remains still nonsense. I have no
time to spare on pointing out your incoherencies in the text, so
you have to rely on your own analytical skills, if any.

Marius Iacomi