Re: [tied] Re: cutulare

m_iacomi wrote:

>> [...] The discusion was with Miguel where at time I wondered
>> that such "latin" compositum with *ex are to find in Rom. just
>> in verbs which begin with "exC" where we have a PIE root with
>> "s" already, thus there is no need to put any Latin help there.
>
> BS aside, you have still to explain Sardinian and South Italian
> forms with "s-", like in Romanian.

"Ausones" was one of my assumptions. You forgot it.

>> again _just the "Latin" root_ will be to find but nothing of
>> the derivatives.
>
> Too confuse to be worthwile.

you want it, you will get it. Just a bit patience.

>
>>>> I don't guess one will can begin anything with a root in
>>>> latin as "quat-", maybe an "quatt-" n asymilation of "quatr-".
>>>
>>> That's pure nonsense.
>>
>> see "quatto"=quadrassis
>
> Repeated nonsense remains nonsense.

Or one is simply ignorant about a question. In this case it seems you
are the one. "quatto" is from "quadrassis", verify your dictionary.


Alex