From: m_iacomi
Message: 23898
Date: 2003-06-26
> g wrote:... to make the link with Medieval Latin, Church language for
>>> ever thought about why Norberg does not mention the Eastern
>>> Romance at all in the examples he gives? Or he does it but I
>>> was not reading carefully?
>>
>> Because there ain't no texts in Eastern Romance in the 1st
>> millennium (perhaps except that "torna, torna, fratre!" :-)
> a turna:vt to pour; to cast; to teem (off);What are you quoting exactly, and why?!
> In fact I guess there is no "turn back" but a "rãsturna" whichWhat about your "(m)"?! Still wondering on coincidences?!
> make sense with the episode mentioned.
> rãsturna= to turn over, to turn down, to overturn. cf DEX: ras+turna
>
> ras: compound element from Slavic ras-, raz-
>
> Slavic? It can be. What about Dacian names as "Rescutur(m)e",
> "Rascu(m)poris"? They will look like "rescuturã" and "rãscumpãrã".