From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 23851
Date: 2003-06-25
> > But how would the relationship Alb. madh <-> Rum. mare "big &large &
> > great" look like? As in the former we see a [d] or [z] > dh, andin the
> > latter an [VrV] (as a rhotacization of __?). (BTW, are these madhrelated (but
> > and mare related to Ind. maha (maharadja, Mahavishnu, Mahatma)?)
>
> I wrote about that pair yesterday. I don't believe they are
> yes, <madh> is related to Gk. mega, Skt. maha-, Eng. mickle/much,etc.;
> its <dh> is a reflex of *g^). See:************
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/23793
>
>
> Piotr