Re: [tied] Re: Historical implications...

From: alex
Message: 23350
Date: 2003-06-15

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
> 15-06-03 21:18, alex wrote:
>
> Ahahaha, look wherefore Piotr is looking.I hopped (serious now) you
> will observe something else.
> The one question with /z/ + /b/,/d/,/g/ but interdiction /z/+/p/, /t/,
> /k/
>
> For many people maybe this is not a big observation, for you it
> should be an interesting one.
>
>
> Sorry to keep you hopping in vain. The generalisation is trivial: /s/
> before voiceless obstruents, /z/ before voiced ones.
>
> Piotr
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

generalisation less Slavic or is there an another explanation for slavic
"sv-"?