Re: [tied] Re: Historical implications...

15-06-03 21:18, alex wrote:

Ahahaha, look wherefore Piotr is looking.I hopped (serious now) you will
observe something else.
The one question with /z/ + /b/,/d/,/g/ but interdiction /z/+/p/, /t/,
/k/

For many people maybe this is not a  big observation, for you it should
be an interesting one.

Sorry to keep you hopping in vain. The generalisation is trivial: /s/ before voiceless obstruents, /z/ before voiced ones.

Piotr