Re: [tied] eclesia (it was Re: Historical )

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:11:58 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:37:44 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> no. ther word is inexistent at all. If this should have been it
>>> should have looked like *iekiSã
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> =======================
>> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>> mcv@...
>
>You expect there an "(ie)keaSã" I suspect.
>

ecclésia > /(e)kl^eas^&/ (> *chiaSã)

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...