Re: [tied] eclesia (it was Re: Historical )

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:37:44 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...>
> wrote:
>
>
>> no. ther word is inexistent at all. If this should have been it
>> should have looked like *iekiSã
>
> Why?
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

You expect there an "(ie)keaSã" I suspect.

alex