[tied] Re: [j] v. [i]

From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 22856
Date: 2003-06-08

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

>>That fits in nicely with Slavic -i vs. -e^, but unfortunately we
can't check against the Baltic o-stem loc.sg.

We can if we accept the (traditional) view that:

1. adverbs like <namie~> 'at home', dial. <orie~> 'in the air',
<tolì> (< *tolíe) ~ dial. <tolie~> 'far', <artì> ~ dial.
<artie~> 'near', <ankstì> ~ dial. <ankstie~> 'early', dial.
<vakarie~> 'in the evening' etc. directly reflect the old o-stem
L.sg. and

2. o-stem adessive (<mis^kíepi> 'to the forest') is an old locative
postfixed with *pie 'to'.

If <namie~> (et. al.) has a metatonized *-íe (circumflex is unmarked
and usually represents an innovation when interdialectal vacillation
between acute and circumflex is observed), the result is exactly the
opposite to what you would expect.

Sergei

Previous in thread: 22847
Next in thread: 22864
Previous message: 22855
Next message: 22857

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts