Re: [tied] Abstractness (Was Re: [j] v. [i])

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 22771
Date: 2003-06-06

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Wordingham
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 8:46 PM
Subject: [tied] Abstractness (Was Re: [j] v. [i])

> Incidentally, I suspect we should move this discussion off Cybalist
onto Phonet, which was set up for discussions such as this when they
wondered too far off the core topic.

I'll second that.

Piotr

Previous in thread: 22770
Next in thread: 22839
Previous message: 22770
Next message: 22772

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts