Re: [tied] Re: a, nu...

m_iacomi wrote:

>
> Please, do me a favor and read. Read what the text was about:
> "In order to explain Romanian "bãtrân" through "*vét-" [...]".
>
> Now read what's your supposed "answer" about: "[...] vét +ui >
> vetúi > vãtúi".
>
> Now compare both.
> Then start thinking.
> It really helps.
>
> Cheers,
> Marius Iacomi

My answer was given to your assumtion of stress dislocation and not to
the question how to make bãtrân from *vét-.
I can show you the the relation vjetër/bãtrân . Right now it has an weak
point which will make it debatable. I need a bit help on Albanian here,
after this I will present this.

Alex