Re: [tied] Abstractness (Was Re: [j] v. [i])

----- Original Message -----
From: Glen Gordon
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Abstractness (Was Re: [j] v. [i])


> Just curious. Is there anything typological that necessitates that *e
represent [e] as opposed to, say, [E]?

Either's OK, as long as it's (basically) a front vowel.

Piotr