Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Rum. prefix în- [Re: Androphobia]

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Fri, 30 May 2003 00:56:29 +0200, alex <alxmoeller@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>>>>> "im Bsl. durchaus durch ne- verdrängt; über ksl. ne-jeN-vêrI
>>>>> ,ungläublig', ne-jeN-sytU ,unersattlich = Pelikan' s. Berneker
>>>>> 429"
>>>>
>>>> ksl. in Baltic when the Balts became very late chrsits =
>>>
>>> What are you babbling? ksl. is Kirchenslavisch. Not Baltic.
>>
>> And this I am babling. How is to asume that in Balto-Slavic the "*n."
>> was replaced by OCS "ne-" ( why OCS "ne" when in fact it is PIE
>> *ne-?)
>
> And where does it say "OCS ne-" ???
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

correct me if I missunderstand something. For me ksl= Kirchslavic and
OCS= Old Church Slavic= one and the same thing.
From Pokorny's text I understood as follow:
" in Baltoslavic, (*n) trough "ne-" replaced; over OCS ( ksl.)
ne-jeN-verI, etc. "
Is something else to understand here?