Re: [tied] Re: integral autochtonists ?

--- S & L <mbusines@...> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alex_tiscali_dsl"
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Ukrainian words from
> Carpathians
>
>
> > tolgs001 wrote:
> > >>> (Alex) Or that the Dacians became latinised
> because
> > >>> 1/3 of their theritory was for 150 Years under
> Roman
> > >>> administration
> > >>
> > >> GK: Yes, that is a difficulty for the
> integral
> > >> autochtonists. But as the literature
> demonstrates it
> > >> is obviously not insuperable (:=)))
>
> Sorry to bother you, but what do you understand by
> "INTEGRAL AUTOCHTONISTS"
> ?
>
> S o r i n

******GK: Those who adhere more or less to the
following ethnogenetic scenario, viz., that today's
Romanians are to a very large and DEFINING extent the
descendants of pre-Roman Dacians, who switched
languages as a result of the Roman conquest, but
tightly held on to the land through all subsequent
occupations, until the time of their historical
re-emergence into the limelight as a Romance-speaking
people on the same territory.*****

>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com