Re: [tied] Palatalization

m_iacomi wrote:

> Yes, it's not an accident. It's just deep ignorance combined
> with wishful thinking. Do you have any idea about phonetical
> meaning of [bh] and what are its' possible evolutions in IE?!
> You just produce nonsenses already replied for which you forgot
> the reply. The regional confusion between [f] and [h] has been
> already exposed to you, and there is still no mistery (it's a
> late Romanian confusion, since [h] was reinstated in local
> Romance by first Slavic loanwords and it appears in Latin words
> like "fir/hir", "fier/h(i)er", etc.).
>
> Cheers,
> Marius Iacomi
>

Mr Iacomi, I am glad I heard your opinion.

regards

alex