Re: [tied]Nestor Chronic ( it was Re: cardinal points)

george knysh wrote:

> *****GK: Your source is obviously incomplete. It lacks
> the passages I was earlier referring to, which can be
> found in the undated part of the Chronicle. I suggest
> you find a better book than the one you are quoting
> from.*****

The intersting passage should have been here. As I told you, from this
passage is to understand what I said. If you mean there are passages in
the undated part of the Chronicle which will say something else ( but
about Romans not about valahs), what is the argumetn which make the link
between the dated part of the Chronicle and the undated part of that
?OK, I will try to find the whole Chroncle, who knows what I find
there:-)

alex