Re: [tied] Got to thinkin' about word order

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 21305
Date: 2003-04-27

On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:11:09 +0000, Glen Gordon
<glengordon01@...> wrote:

>
>I said:
>>IE doesn't seem to have the typical order that an SOV language should have
>>(such as the placement of the negative before the verb, and relative
>>particles placed before the clause).
>
>Piotr:
>>What makes you think that *ne wasn't placed before the verb?
>
>Ugh, Piotr, you misunderstood. We agree completely. You're trying to
>convince
>someone that wasn't even objecting to a PIE SOV order. Reread the above.

I misunderstood in the same way as Piotr did and had written a similar
reaction, when I realized the possibility of an alternative reading
just before hitting the "Send" button.

In any case, the normal relative clause order in Hittite is not NRel,
but typical SOV RelN (Friedrich 334, e.g. "nu-za {d}UTU-_S^I_ kuin
NAM.RA _INA_ É LU.GAL uwatenun nas^ 15,500 NAM.RA e:s^ta" ("and
my-Sun-God which prisoner to the king-house I brought and-it 15,500
prisoner was" = "and the prisoners which I, my Sun-God, brought to the
palace were 15,500 prisoners").

Please explain what a subjunctive with /h1/ has to do with word order
and relative clauses.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...