Re: [tied] IE genitive

> REGARDING *-ske- AND ITS NEWNESS
> it seems safe to say that the suffix is comprised of the aorist *-s- and
> intensive *-g-, so it probably _was_ originally an aorist.

Are there any examples of non-sigmatic aorists + "intensive -g-" used in a
repetitive or incohative sense? That woudl help convince me.

Peter