>If the deseinence had been syllabic, it would have
> attracted the accent. It didn't, so *-m was not syllabic.
Pardon me, Miguel, but isn't this circular? Didn't you argue a posting or
two ago that the suffix did not take the accent because it was not
syllabic - yet here you say it is not syllabic because it didn't take the
accent?
Or perhaps I misunderstand...
Peter
Previous in thread: 21236 Next in thread: 21252 Previous message: 21241 Next message: 21243