From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 21221
Date: 2003-04-23
>Your initial accent rule works in such a degreed way, so agreed.
>
>On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:19:50 +0200 (CEST), Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
>> <jer@...> wrote:
>>
>> >Outside of the main debate: Armenian has final stress, but still accepts
>> >words like tasn, eLungn, ezr, astL. Surely such a language should not be
>> >alarming to Indo-Europeanists. It does not follow from that, however, that
>> >the possibility was utilized exactly in the case under discussion.
>>
>> No, but it follows from the fact that the accusative singular is a
>> strong case. If the desinence had been syllabic, it would have
>> attracted the accent. It didn't, so *-m was not syllabic.
>
>I'd say that's a fair way of presenting it. Another could be to say there
>are degrees in this: Full vowels attract the accent, syllabic consonants
>do not. Do we agree that strong paradigm forms have flexives without
>original vowels, while those of weak paradigm forms do have vowels in
>them? I believe that is exactly correct.