From: bmscotttg
Message: 20851
Date: 2003-04-07
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>No, I didn't introduce the distinction. Rather, you are failing
> wrote:
> > I have only
> > one question: how do you distinguish your 'creoles' from
> > real ones -- those born of pidgins -- terminologically? Or
> > do you really think that all of your 'creoles' do derive
> > from pidgins?
> You introduced this distinction - I didn't.
> Of course there would have been a pidgin or "foreigner talk"If so, it evidently had very little effect on the development
> after Hastings.