From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 20686
Date: 2003-04-02
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"separate"
> <akonushevci@...> wrote:
> > Çabej treats it as cognate with Skt dalyati "to split, to
> > and as an unchauvenistic linguist, even with Slavic*delbto/*dolbto.
> > Regards,Indic /l/,
> > Konushevci
> > ************
>
> The Skt. forms are actually <dalati> 'burst, fly open' and its
> causative <da:layati>. There are well-known problems with
> and it's hard to guarantee that this particular word reflects PIEbut
> *del- rather than being a by-form of Indic {dar-} < *der- 'tear',
> let's leave Indic alone and assume that Pokorny's reconstruction ofso
> the root *del- is basically correct.
>
> Your earlier claim was that <daltë> could be derived from "*da-",
> let's note for the record now that you seem to be claimingsomething
> else now (*del- can't be an extended root). Balto-Slavic *delb- is<daltë>
> almost certainly related to Germanic *delb- (cf. Eng. delve) -- a
> typical North European root restricted to these three branches and
> reconstructible as *dHelbH- (therefore unrelated to *del-).
>
> Now let me repeat my question in this new context: If Albanian
> derives from *del-, can you present the derivation in some detail?In
> particular, I'd like to see in what way this hypothesis issuperior to
> the widespread opinion that <daltë> 'chisel' and <baltë> 'mud' are
> early loans from Slavic (reflecting unmetathesised *dolto, *bolto).
>
> Piotr