From: Che
Message: 20334
Date: 2003-03-25
----- Original Message -----From: Glen GordonSent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:41 PMSubject: Re: [tied] Japanese as a creole language?
>That's why I like you, Glen. You're an irreverent S.O.B. :-)
Damn right. Now lick my boots.
>In any case, if Japanese is not 100% proven to have anything to do with the
>Altaic language family,
Clarification. Japanese may or may not be related to the rest of Altaic
depending one what your criteria on relationship happens to be. However
regardless, it most certainly has something "to do with the Altaic language
family" because of transparently Altaic words in Japanese vocabulary.
Japanese can be said to be at least **partly** Altaic, even if it isn't
an "Altaic" language per se.
There is a sizeable enough vocabulary in Japanese that is, without doubt,
connectable to other Altaic languages. However, the issue is whether they
are merely loans from prehistoric contact, or whether Japanese honestly
inherited them directly from the proto-language.
Personally, I suspect that part of the reason why there is this issue
of classification at all is because Proto-Altaic might have been spread
out over a very large area amongst a group of very nomadic people with
dialects smoothly graduating from west to east like a spectrum of light.
Long term areal contact and only partial absorption of neighbouring
dialects would result in a not-so-easily classifiable family of languages.
Imagine if a language split up and then remerged many times over a couple
thousand years -- Get your head around THAT, I tell ya!
>Or, are you saying, that the positioning/classification of (Proto-)
>Japanese doesn't factor into said reconstruction?
Yes.
- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.