Re: [tied] GLEN AND ANATOLIA IN 7500BC

GLEN WROTE:
<<[Hattic and Hurro-Urartian does NOT eliminate the presence of IE.] True as
always, but who cares about the damn unicorns??>>

<<I fear for your sanity too. This is ridiculous. Apparently you both don't
seem to have a problem with using ignorance as an excuse to propose
anything.>>

<<By the same stretch of half-assed reasoning...>>

<<By all evidence, Hattic is more autochthonous than IE, and this is the
common scientific consensus -- It's not based on some cockamamey cult called
Christianity... Oops, I meant to say "religion">>

<<I'm just strange and misunderstood as usual.>>

<<One of those things is the contact between FU and IIr, datable to about
2500 BCE or so. If IE came from Anatolia, why on earth would an IE language
get up there only to come back down again to India?>>

GEORGE KNYSH WROTE:
<<Glen,...I find most of your analyses quite persuasive...sober, logical...>>

Interesting!