From: tgpedersen
Message: 20118
Date: 2003-03-20
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:As I implied too. Voluntary cooperation towards a common goal (but in
> > On the mix of Iazyges and native Germani
> >
> > http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/annals.8.xii.html
> >
> > this is ca. 50 AD. As I thought, native Germanic
> > infantry, Iranian
> > cavalry.
>
> ******GK: Certainly not "as you thought". The Iazyges
> were the recently (ca. 20 AD) relocated Metanastae,
> who occupied the plains of the Alfold (across from
> Roman Pannonia) whence they had dislodged the Dacians
> (cf. Pliny). They were Vannius' allies, not his
> subjects.
>There is no evidence that they brought anyDanish Kvissel (kw < tw) in several locations = branch in navigable
> Bastarneans with them. This has nothing whatever to do
> with your "Odin" hallucinations.*******
> >
> > BTW I wonder if Adorsi = Aorsi?
>
> *****GK: Indeed. Most of them were still east of the
> Don in 50 AD, though some groups had crossed it
> towards the West, and had become the ruling class of a
> revived Scythian state.******
> >
> > And check
> >
> > http://www.euratlas.com/time/nea0001.htm
> >
> > Obviously to get from Tanakvisl (going by the name a
> > fork in the Don,
> > thus close to the mouth of the river)
>
> *****GK: The Tanakvisl does no refer to the mouth of
> the river, but either to the area including its main
> tributaries, or, much more preferably, to the area
> where the Don is closest to the Volga (some
> geographers confused the two rivers because the
> Don-Volga portage was easy there).******
> to ThuringiaYour interpretation of Snorri implies he had no historical knowledge
> > you cross
> > Bastarnean territory (I suppose the won't matter too
> > much for the
> > location of various peoples that the map is 50 years
> > off).
>
> *******GK: If you stick to your source, you will note
> that "Odin and company" first travelled from "Asgard"
> WEST to "Gardariki". Gardariki, in Snorri's time was
> Kyivan Rus' and its associates ("the land of
> strongholds"), including the important (for the Old
> Norse) stronghold of Holmgard (Novgorod).
>Here weWhy? Obviously west, then south won't take you from Tanaquisl to
> should read WEST as "north and west", north along the
> Volga then west eventually reaching the Holmgard area.
> This route, well known to the Norse, already existedThat's not the direct path from Southern Scandinavia.
> at the time of Jordanes.==
>Afterwards, "Odin andAssuming (as you, and Snorri? do) that Gardariki was Holmgard.
> company" went SOUTH to Saxland. This means (in order
> to make any geographical sense at all) that they
> travelled from the area of Novgorod to northern
> Germany (via the Baltic).
>That's the only possibilityThis is bizarre. An "impulse", not people travelling?
> if you're going SOUTH from Gardariki. So even on
> Snorri's geography the Bastarneans cannot be involved
> in "Odin's trek". Pritsak thought (and this is
> possible) that Snorri was describing the route from
> Khazaria to Scandinavia, with "Odin" representing the
> impulse
>which resulted in the reform of the futhark.Source?
> But even so, Snorri's account confuses many things:
> Troy legends, Norse explorations along the Volga,
> Gothic lore perhaps. There is nothing "historical"
> about it. And your dating of it, plus everything else
> you've advanced (esp. the Bastarneans) is naive and
> ridiculous beyond belief. As for the Osi, they were a
> Pannonian tribe, which paid tribute to the Iranian
> Iazyges.
>But I suppose that hallucinations are at aBut cf Snorri's prologue:
> premium here.*******
> >