From: tgpedersen
Message: 20076
Date: 2003-03-19
> tgpedersen wrote:to
> >> ******GK: Now this is completely fantastic, as pointed
> >> out many many times, apparently to no avail. In 60/50
> >> BC the only "Iranians" which would (barely, since
> >> neither controlled cities)fit Snorri's Odin story
> >> would be either the Aorsi or the Alans.
> > I assume you want there to be cities because of a "Slavic
> > interpretation of the name Ásgard. But 'garD' in Old Norse means
> > farmstead, 'kongsgaard' in older Danish "court", and the word has
> > do with surrounding, fencing in. Thus Ásgard, if it existed, wouldRomanian.
> > have been little more than a stronghold or keep.
>
> the form "gard" without methatesis is to find in Albanian and
> In Rom. it means just "fence".That
>
>
> > I realised that I had completely left out the Jastorf culture.
> > means I don't have to claim a Bastarnean component in an Iranian -strong
> > Germanic mix in Thuringia
> >
> > Torsten
>
>
> I must agree with George that in teh time BC the Bastarnae were
> enough for having an Iranian ruling class. If once, then long timetime
> before. After 100 AC , there is by no way the possibility of having
> Iranian masters. Just the Roxolanes and Yaziges or maybe some
> Sarmatians, but I doubt since these could not come until the isle of
> Peuce where the Bastarnae lived to last. And in fact, just in the
> came the Goths. Why should accept a Germanic folk an Iranian classas
> rulers when in that time the Goths have been so powerfully? Itdoesn't
> make any sense to put some Iranian pieces here, don't you find?You may do it but I don't. I was talking of the first century BCE.
> But it seems curious to me why always these Iranians? If you take alook
> at every folk we are speaking about there should be some Iraniansthere
> as "rulers". It seems a bit funny to me. It looks more as papergame but
> no more..The People of the steppe at the time were Iranian-speakers. Peoples