Re: [tied] Veneti

What are the main arguments pro et contra?

Alexander

----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Veneti


> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, " Alexander Stolbov" <astolbov@...>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid I miss something here.
> > Both Phrygian and Armenian are "satem" languages, whereas Greek is a
> "kentum" one, are not they? Even if Phrygian is not very close to
> Armenian, how could it be closer to Greek than to it?
> > Or you meant not cladistic but areal relations here?
>
> No, I mean cladistic relations. I simply don't accept the claim that
> Phrygian was a Satem language.
>
> Piotr