Re: [tied] Veneti

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, " Alexander Stolbov" <astolbov@...>
wrote:

> I'm afraid I miss something here.
> Both Phrygian and Armenian are "satem" languages, whereas Greek is a

"kentum" one, are not they? Even if Phrygian is not very close to
Armenian, how could it be closer to Greek than to it?

> Or you meant not cladistic but areal relations here?

No, I mean cladistic relations. I simply don't accept the claim that
Phrygian was a Satem language.

Piotr