Re: [tied] Re: 'Simple' Future

From: Patrick C. Ryan
Message: 19286
Date: 2003-02-26

Dear Richard:


----- Original Message -----
From: <richard.wordingham@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:57 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: 'Simple' Future


--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com,
"Patrick C. Ryan"
<proto-language@...> wrote:

<snip>

JRW:
The negative of 'he needs to go' is
'he doesn't need to go'. 'He
needn't go' negates the necessity in
'he must go'. Interestingly,
'needn't' is indifferent to tense; I
am tempted to view it as a second
negative to 'must'.

[PCR]
For me, the negative would be: "He does not have to go".


Pat

PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE@... (501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE: http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/ and PROTO-RELIGION: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html "Veit ec at ec hecc, vindgá meiði a netr allar nío, geiri vndaþr . . . a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit, hvers hann af rótom renn." (Hávamál 138)