Peter posts for the sake of directionless chit-chat:
>> You side with Miguel on this je-ne-sais-quoi that distinguishes
>> /n/ and /m/.
>> You and Miguel fail to elaborate on what it is.
>> This therefore remains conjecture.
>
>Alas it is far from conjecture. /n/ is in the dental region, /m/ not.
Duh! Of course /m/ and /n/ are different and of course neighbouring
vowels can have differing reflexes! You didn't read the previous posts.
That's not even my objection.
I object to Miguel's half-assed claim that Pre-IE *m causes resistance
of Pre-IE *a > IE *o due to some "mysterious" quality. WHAT QUALITY???
This assertion of his is what "remains conjecture" as per my quote above.
- gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail