From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 18694
Date: 2003-02-10
----- Original Message -----
From: "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] The word for horse
> I showed you words where is no rotacism of a simple "l" too.
Did you? There was no rhotacism if the *l was palatalised at the time (but that's a regular thing) or if the word with intervocalic /l/ is a post-rhotacism borrowing. I can't recall any real counterexamples.
Piotr