From: tgpedersen
Message: 18444
Date: 2003-02-05
>earls and churls once; might in that case the latter not be derived
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tgpedersen@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Latin versus *Proto-Romance
>
>
>
> > I recall you proposed to divide early North Germanic society into
>without rank, the lower order of freemen. Actually, Charlemagne's
> It would work formally, but not semantically. The churls were men
>Which means, I suppose, it would work if North Germanic society was
> Piotr