Re: [tied] *pa(x)u- "small" and "fire"?

----- Original Message -----
From: <richard.wordingham@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] *pa(x)u- "small" and "fire"?


> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> > I don't think the general theory of PIE extensions (if ever
> formulated) will be that simple, but I find your idea that *pah2-u-
> might be a derivative of *pah2- really brilliant and I think I'll buy
> it if you don't charge too much :-). Congratulations, Glen.
>
> If you don't _buy_ it, how would you cite it? Public communication?

Hey, Glen has learnt a thing or two on this list, haven't you, Glen? How about deducting the market price of the etymology from my fee? :-))

Piotr