Re: [tied] *pa(x)u- "small" and "fire"?

From: Richard Wordingham Message: 18031
Date: 2003-01-24

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> I don't think the general theory of PIE extensions (if ever
formulated) will be that simple, but I find your idea that *pah2-u-
might be a derivative of *pah2- really brilliant and I think I'll buy
it if you don't charge too much :-). Congratulations, Glen.

If you don't _buy_ it, how would you cite it? Public communication?

Richard.