Re: [tied] Primordial Man, Ymir, *Yemos, PIE cosmogony

What if and older *Jimjaz (ON *Imir), *Jemaz (ON *Jamm>*Amm) was replaced
for *Jumjaz ? Just guessing...

Joao SL

----- Original Message -----
From: Piotr Gasiorowski <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Primordial Man, Ymir, *Yemos, PIE cosmogony



----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Primordial Man, Ymir, *Yemos, PIE cosmogony



> But I'm confused. Where then does the *-m- come from if it is from *yeu-?
And where does "Yama" come from then if not from *Yemos? Is there another
etymology possible for the latter?

No, no. It comes from *jemos, of course. What I'm saying is that <yama-> and
<ymir> are unrelated to each other, but that the latter is related to
<jumis>. Two different etymologies.

The <-m-> of <ymir>/<jumis> is suffixal (*jumjos via deverbal *ju-mó-, I
suppose), while in *jemos the *-m- belongs to the root (*jem-o-).

Piotr






Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/