Re: [tied] Of Aryanism

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

> There is some "autochtonic" fantasizing
> bandied about in all quarters, but in reality it's
> "invasion" (and mixing) all the way. Why should the
> Indians of India be an exception? Especially since the
> early "invading" Indo-Europeans in their case were
> hardly "Westerners".*****

The Indians have suffered several invasions in historical times, and
they are hardly homegeneous anyway.

Where can I find the view on the Eastern front? Is Austro-Asiatic
(i.e. Munda in India) accepted as 'intrusive'? (I suppose such
discussions would better be held at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/austric , though origins in China have
been discussed at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/austronesian .)

Richard.