Re: [tied] das Wort

--- In cybalist@..., Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:35:24 -0000, "tgpedersen"
> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> >--- In cybalist@..., Piotr Gasiorowski <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Miguel Carrasquer
> >> To: cybalist@...
> >> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:55 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [tied] das Wort
> >>
> >>
> >> > Perhaps then Germanic (ga-)warr- "confusion" (> Pol.
> >gwar "turmoil, fuss")? Not sure if it's in Gothic, but since it

also

> >gives Romance *gwerra "war", it was apparently available.
> >>
> >> But isn't the Gmc. root *wers-/*werz-? If so, EGmc. *ga-werzan-
> >doesn't fit.
> >>
> >> Piotr
> >
> >Odd. Y'all have just discussed, by some coincidence, two words
> >containing an unwanted dental suffix, <salt> and <word>.
>
> The *-d in salt may be odd, but what's unwanted about *dh in
> word/verbum?

Many may want it; but if it went away it the remainder would fit
Slavic govor- .

>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

Torsten