Re: [tied] Re: the glottalic theory

From: Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
Message: 16746
Date: 2002-11-14

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, tgpedersen wrote:

> That is obviously true if the occurrence of voiced vs unvoiced liquid
> is derivable from something earlier.

Thank you, for then it *is* true. The voiceless -r- is derivable from -r-
positioned before a voiceless stop, while -l- is always voiced. That's how
simple it is.