Re: [tied] Gmc. *bru:diz

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 16391
Date: 2002-10-18

Is it really Paul Kiparsky's? Pokorny makes the connection as well, as does the EIEC (no doubt after Pokorny). No exact derivation is offered by either for the Germanic 'brain' word, but *mrog(^)H- + *-ono- seems plausible (cf. *wog^H- + *-ono- > *wag(a)na- and other similar forms in Germanic (whatever this *-ono- actually is). Gk. brekHmós and brékHma (*mreg(^)H-mó-, *mrég(^)H-mn) have a deverbal look to them. Has anyone suggested an interpretation of this underlying *mreg(^)H-?
 
Piotr
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Gmc. *bru:diz



On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

[For IE *mr- > Germanic br-]
>
> Perhaps OE, OS bregdan "to plait", Du. breien "to knit" ~ Grk. brokhós
> "Strick,
> Schlinge, Masche", MIR. braige, braga "captive", OCS mre^z^a "Netz,
> Schlinge"
> (*mregh-) ?


It *is* beginning to look good. I have also wondered, in the light of the
new idea on *bru:diz, if the connection made by P.Kiparsky between Eng.
brain and Greek brekhm¢s 'front part of the head' (reported by Mayrhofer,
Idg.Gr.,  Lautlehre p. 114) should be taken to represent IE *mr-, not
*bhr-. That would sidestep the Grassmann problem addressed by Kiparsky and
Mayrhofer.

I think we must congratulate João Simões Lopes Filho (whose name won't
come out right on my new computer) on a very felicitous idea. Sometimes
this list does produce real progress. Let's have some more, Joao!


Jens




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Previous in thread: 16390
Next in thread: 16395
Previous message: 16390
Next message: 16392

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts