[tied] Re: Lith. Acc.pl.

--- In cybalist@..., "Sergejus Tarasovas" <S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

> > [-ms] is just that.
>
> Oops! I was thinking of the ran~koms at the moment. The third

syllable

> is [mIs] ([I] for non-tense ("short") /i/, more or less like

English [I]

> in <bit>).
>
> Sergei

Thank you again, both for this and your account of Lithuanian stress
and pitch. What I had hoped to find out was whether it made sense to
tag the 'o' of '-omìs' as 'circumflex', but this now clearly seems to
be a meaningless question for Standard Lithuanian.

Richard.