Re: [tied] Re: Miguel & dentis

----- Original Message -----
From: "richardwordingham" <richard.wordingham@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:50 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: Miguel & dentis


> I am puzzled by Miguel's hint that 'tz' is Slavonic '-its-'.
Has
> this suffix been productive in Romanian? A Slavonic
ze,bitsU (or
> something similar - I am no Slavicist) seems to be being
proposed as
> a source, but did Slavonic actually use the e-grade or zero
grade of
> the root? Am I overlooking something else?
>
> Richard.

[moeller] i dont find the "m" of Miguel . And tehre are many
sufixes which have been copnsidered to be slavic. Remember my
post with "ava"?
the one is not a slavic sufix. And "tz" is productive in
romanian. But of course, hjust in the speech of the normal
folk. Not of the intelectuals. Which as normal folk , I will
say an onomatopoe now in romanian " ete, scârtz"= I dont care.
where "ete"= iatã= look here.