From: george knysh
Message: 13456
Date: 2002-04-24
> Baltic and Slavic, Indo-Aryan and Iranian are recent***** GK: I wouldn't exactly designate something that
> branch-size bifurcations.
> latter two into one branch only because we happen to*****GK: I have no problem in seeing "Indic" and
> know their closely related "Old" stages -- the
> modern languages are not so similar at all.
> as we know it (with Grimm, Verner and the stress*****GK: About as "recent" as Baltic and Slavic*****
> shift) is also a recent product -- not even 2500
> years old.
> already grown about as different as Celtic and Latin*****GK: Well maybe they have to you as a professional
> (and maybe even pre-Grimm pre-Germanic) were
> 2500-3000 years ago.
> requires a sufficient time depth; what's a dialectal*****GK: It's hard to say exactly what had arisen by
> difference at present may become a branch division
> in two thousand years' time in favourable
> circumstances. What had arisen by 3000 BC were not
> the modern branches as we know them from very much
> later written records but the ancestral languages of
> some of them, still quite similar to one another.