From: tarasovass
Message: 12749
Date: 2002-03-19
> By the way, this word is a respectable IE term, *g^(e)mh1-to- or *g^(e)mh1-ro- 'son-in-law' (literally 'the married one'), cf. e.g. Lat.
>Thus, no connection with *genh1- as I've always supposed for z^éntas?