Re: [tied] countries, languages , XX! centuries

From: altamix
Message: 12711
Date: 2002-03-17

Re: [tied] countries, languages , XX! centuries
<I think you are forgetting all the mercenaries that joined the Roman army for a certain time after which many of them went back to their old place.
<I am sure they had to learn Latin to be able to work as soldiers.
 
 
I do not forget them. I just would like to remeber that the romas were very strict on the componence of the legions.
And they put together the people from the same region. The iberiasn in legion Iberica, the Italians in legion Italica and so on
Just wery fe legions were made from mixed people. If i am not wrong, one of them was Gemina made from two legions.
Moreover the cohortes used to use their own language and they used they national weapons in fight.
Just the comnader of the cohortes must know latin language. These are proven facts.
Adn because we know the components of the roman armie which were in Dacia, this is why there are
questions ( among others).
In Dacia after 118 there were just one Lgeion and this is Gemina. in 170 ( i guess i a not wrong) the romans brought an another Legion called Macedonica.
Gemina componence was of mixed people. Iberians, sirians, italians and so on.
Macedonica wwas with thracians and macedonians soldiers. If dacians were thracians and their langauge were likely, the soldiers from theye last legion could understand each other with the dacians in their own language.
We have no idea about any translator within Dacia. Bu we have an acheological evidence found in Budapest in old Panonia about a certain
person who worked as dacain translator . That means, even there were some dacians around and we learn from the componence of the panonian legions that the soldiers there were not coming from thrace..
Is not that easy.. but i guess we will find the right point one day:))
 
Best regards
 
A. Moeller