From: george knysh
Message: 12144
Date: 2002-01-24
> There's must have been some finer semantic*****GK: Not Ermana:riks? Ermanari:ks sounds Thracian
> distinctions once upon a time. Both terms (and more)
> were current among the Germani. <�iudans> survives
> in Old English as poetic <�e:oden> 'leader of the
> people, lord' (applied also to Christ). Tolkien fans
> will recall the title "Theoden". Then, we have
> *ri:k- (ultimately from *h3reg^-, but borrowed from
> Celtic), passed on to the Balts (Old Prussian rikis)
> and found in Gothic royal names (Ermanari:ks, of
> course).
>__________________________________________________
> Piotr
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Kuningaz
>
>
> >******GK: Is *kuningaz attested, or reconstructed?
> I
> >checked out a couple of Gothic dictionaries and
> didn't
> >find it there.******
>
> The Gothic for "king" is <�iudans>. Some of the
> oldest attested forms
> are ON <konungr>, OE <cyning>, OHG <kuning>. None
> quite as
> archaic-looking as Finnish <kuningas>, though.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>