From: george knysh
Message: 11948
Date: 2001-12-28
>Note
>
> >(GK) Your rendition of "Kolaxais" seems plausible.
> that the collective name of the Scythian*****GK: There is indeed a King "Scolopithes"
> aristocratic clans (Paralata, Aukhata etc..) was
> SKOLOTA, and was constructed, it seems, from
> KOLA-XAIS (according to a comment by Herodotus).
>
>(PG) Well, Herodotus says "after one of their kings",
> having mentioned Koloxais in the preceding sentence;
> it seems as if Koloxais and *Skolotos (or *Skolos,
> or whatever his name) had been two different
> fellows.
>its
> >(GK) As for PARALATA it seems quite obvious that
> Greek translation waspar
> "BASILEI" (the "Royals").
>
>(PG) My etymological suggestion was *pari-arya- 'Arya
> excellence', which I suppose amounts to the samethat
> thing ("the noblest of the noble").
>
> >(GK) As to the second brother: I've read somewhere
> the name is sometimes explained from "ARP"="AP"*****GK: Quite a bit. The association of "Serpent"
> (Water) as "King of the Water" (perhaps an Abayev
> etymology but my memory is uncertain here).
>
>PG) This is quite impossible. The Ossetic metathesis
> *-Cr- > *-rC- (whereby *ap-ra- > *arf- 'deep') can't
> be that old. The next possibility that has occurred
> to me is *harpa-xs^aya- 'serpent-ruler'. It's looks
> attractive on the formal side; any historical
> support?